Anna Movie Review: Like The Man Himself, Anna’s Bio-Pic Means Well


Starring: Shashank Udapurkar

Written & Directed by: Shashank Udapurkar

Rating: ***

Serving the cause of cinema may not be as vital and crucial as serving the nation. However  making a film on the selflessly altruistic life of Anna Hazare, the saintly ascetic man whosinglehandedly took on the task of eradicating corruption—and failed—seems like a  task as daunting as nation-building.

Writer-director Shashank Udapurkar must  be lauded in no  uncertain terms for taking on the uphill task of telling the story so gripped and cramped by socio-political complexities that even Richard Attenborough would have been stumped as to where to begin the task of unravelling the life of a man who went from farmer to national leader without losing his innocence .

The narrative keeps it simple austere and stripped-down. Almost like Anna Hazarehimself. There is a certain sincerity of purpose that Anna embodies in his persona. The film assumes a  similar role of transparency in bringing to us various vital incidents and anecdotes that shaped the destiny of the man who could have been King but chose anonymity.The tone is as blunt as a Doordarshan documentary. And that is not an undesirable format to assume  , provided the storyteller can pick out moments of revelation from the documentation.

One could argue sternly against the cult of anointment that elevates  figures in a bio-pic to a demi-good. We  recently saw Dhoni being extolled to the point where all his (self-confessed) flaws were swept away in a tidal wave of encomium. Anna is even more eulogistic in tone.If at all the saintly man’s weaknesses show up in the narrative, it is to underscore his ultimate moral supremacy.

I sorely missed seeing the human being behind the haloed surface. But then I realized thatUdapurkar made the film not to humanize  Hazare but  as a fan-boy eager to share his hero-worship with the world. In that endeavour Anna strikes gold.Very often the narrative assumes the personality of a mythological. We see  Udapurkar as Anna  posturing inpauranic positions that  project him as demi-God. Expectantly the other characters including fellow-politicians are reduced to shadowy figures basking the glorious radiance of the king-maker’s humility and benevolence.Capable  actors  like Govind Nmadeo,Kishore Kadam and Rajit Kapoor portray sketchy parts.

There is not doubt as to who endows an epicenter to extolling excursion. Either is the on-screen Anna on screen or other actors talking about him.

As an actor Udapurkar is reasonably convincing, even as  he seems immeasurably convinced of his proximity to the man whom he so nakedly idolizes.

Yes,  Anna is  a 2-hour paean  to the  humble visionary who could have changed the shape and destiny of our politics if only he had not allowed power-politics to be transferred to people around him.

Udapurkar could have taken the bio-pic to frontiers far beyond Anna  Hazare’s publicmage. Instead Udapurkar elects  to portray his idol in calendar-art shades.That is an approach not unknown in bio-pics. Laudatory and hero-worshipful Anna gives us a  vivid broad-stroke look into the life of a man who swept into Indian politics with a hope for change.  Alas, Anna was short-changed. The film blessedly manages to stay above thebreastbeating of  betrayal.

Irrfan Khan: “This Is  A  Great Time To Be An Indian Actor”

Previous article

Pierce Brosnan Selling Paan Masala Banned On Indian Television

Next article


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *