Connect with us

CBFC Chairperson Slams Reports Of Misbehaviour



An allegation of gender misconduct by the makers of the new Nawazuddin starrer Babumoshai Bandookbaaz has opened up a new can of worms for the already-beleaguered  Censor Board Of Film Certification(CBFC).

The makers of the new censor-targeted dark thriller claim that the film’s female producer Kiran Shroff  was “humiliated” by members of  the censor board for her choice of subject and the choice of  clothes she had worn during the censor screening  of the film.

Confirming these shocking allegation the Babumoshai Bandookbaaz director Kushan Nandy says, “It was  shocking to have my producer subjected to these insults, and that too  after we were told to accept innumerable verbal and visual cuts by the Examining Committee of the CBFC. After the screening  one of the board members commented on my producers clothes.”

Kushan  says he met the CBFC chairperson Pahlaj Nihlani who “threatened” him with more cuts. “He told me  I had two options. I could either go to the Revising Committee where I’d be given even more cuts. Or I could take  my film to the Tribunal. I  chose the latter option. Mr Nihalani spoke to  me in an extremely arrogant tone. I tried to reason with him about  the  cuts. One  of the dialogues that his Examaning Committee ordered out drew an inference to an erection. But I pointed out to Mr Nihalani that he had shot a  whole song called Khada haitwenty years ago in celebration of  an erection. But he wouldn’t hear any of it. In fact he was so arrogant as to to tell me that I should grateful the CBFC didn’t ban my film. He is obviously acting at the behest of his political bosses.Without their backing he couldn’t be doing what he is doing.”

But a  livid Pahlaj Nihalani has a completely different story to tell.  “Kushan Nandy is lying. No untoward incident happened with his producer. No member of the censor board would make such a comment.If it did why didn’t he mention theincident to me  when he met me? We are a responsible  group of people  doing our job. In fact it irks people like Kushan Nandy why we do our job so well. Yes, he did come to meet me after his film was rejected by our Examining Committee for what he calls a ‘private meeting’.”

While Kushan claims he was threatened with more cuts Nihalani reverses the charge. “During the meeting he tried to intimidate me by using his political clout. He tried to get the cuts in his film restored by using his political connections.He claims  I threatened him. I did no such thing. And  if the incident with his producer during the film’s screening for the Examining Committee really happened Kushan Nandy would’ve mentioned it to me. He did no such thing. I repeat, there was no mention of any such incident when he met me.”

Nihalani feels Kushan is being provoked  into badmouthing him by  some disgruntled members of the CBFC. “From the time I was brought in as the CBFC chairperson these handful of team members have been working against the CBFC’s interests. They want to project themselves as the liberal forces in the censor board. And never mind if they end of repeatedly ridiculing and flaunting CBFC guidelines and rules.”

Continue Reading