In a case filed against the makers of Samrat Prithviraj ,the petitioner sought stay on the release of the film on the ground that it wrongly projects King Prithviraj as a Rajput, even as there is material available that indicates that he belonged to the Gurjar caste.
The Hon’ble Court disposed off the petition while recording the statement on behalf of YRF that the film is caste-neutral and that there is no mention of King Prithviraj belonging either to the Rajput community or the Gurjar community. The film is only centered on glorifying the Indian warrior and king – Samrat Prithviraj.
TMT Law Practice represented Yash Raj Films (YRF), Aditya Chopra, Uday Chopra and Chandraprakash Dwivedi .
For those enamoured of the first two films in the funny-fearsome franchise, Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 is deliberately… Read More
Who discovered Smita Patil for cinema? We all think it is Shyam Benegal. But veteran … Read More
The talented Shreyas Talpade admits that the fact he went through a serious health crisis… Read More
Just days before release you had humbug litigation claiming that your film was a copy?… Read More
Nagarjuna: Exclusive On The Criminal Defamation Case Against Telangana Minister Konda Surekha B kha actually… Read More
It’s been 12 years of your English Vinglish, a life-changing experience? Gosh, is it really… Read More
Leave a Comment