Exclusive Premium Content
Joker: Folie A Deux, A Fractured Symphony Of Broken Hearts
Just the joy of watching two of Hollywood’s brightest stars, one an acknowledged singing powerhouse the other a new convert to the chord of conduct, should be incentive enough for us to waltz through director Tod Phillips’ beguiling spiritual sequel to Joker.
The second part is as far removed first as One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest from the Sound Of Music. But that’s exactly what Joker: Folie A Deux is: a musical wrapped around a depressing story of mental illness.
When this surreptitiously profound sequel starts , we know Arthur Flex, a.k.a Joker, has killed five people. It could be six people. We can’t be sure. Arthur-slash-Joker can’t sure. To be bequeathed with a hero who can’t be trusted is a curse for any cinema ,particularly one which aspires to be a portrait of a mind on the brink.
Joaquin Phoenix as the precipitously unhinged Joker gives a dizzying spin to a film that doesn’t know its mind. Or rather, chooses not to. Joker: Folie a Deux is a musical wrapped in a courtroom drama .It is also an acutely tragic romantic tale a, symphony of fractured emotions , underpinned by a rush of profound tragedy.
The sheer privilege of watching Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga singing classics like “Get Happy”, “For Once in My Life” and “What the World Needs Now Is Love”. “It’s Showtime” and “That’s Entertainment” is a pleasure beyond measure.
However the Broadway angle in a film about incurable psychosis is somewhat unnerving.
I am not sure that the musical format works here. It’s as though while Arthur Fleck tries to figure out his dual personality as the Joker, the screenplay takes musical breaks. The songs thereby become bridges between reality and fantasy , between sanity and insanity.
The musical equation between Joaquin and Gaga is pitch perfect.If not for their disembodied equation as a couple, the two deserve Oscars for their mutual sonority.
All said and sung,the questions that remains vitally unanswered is this: would the Joker sequel, for all its artful splendour and musical resonance(I especially like Gaga bursting into the Carpenters’ “Close To You” when she comes visiting Arthur in jail) appeal to the audience that turned the first Joker film into a raging cult product?
I am afraid not! The sequel is way too distanced from the first film,and Joaquin Phoenix’s character for all his murderous madness, evoked sympathy and support earlier. Here he is so filled with righteous delinquency, it feels as though he has not only lost his mind he has also decided that martyrdom suits him and his television personality.
That’s not what the Joker fans are looking for. While the duets with Lady Gaga are likely to be seen as intrusive , Joaquin Phoenix’s performance is extraordinarily apt. He is at once the victim and perpetrator, sophisticated in his evil designs and yet a victim of abuse and intolerance.
I wish some of the other performances could match up. The Judge at the trial (played by Bill Smitrovich) is wallpaperish as compared with other prominent courtroom dramas, as though to remind us that standing-out is not the best way to be.And who knows this better than the Joker?