Jaya Bachchan On Amitabh Bachchan

We hardl​y​ know anything about him. Do you feel there is a  shortage of literature on Mr Bachchan?

Why only him? There ‘s an acute shortage  of literature about    every film personality . It’s such a pity that there’re no authoritative books on actors like Ashok Kumar and Dilip Kumar. Personally I’d love to  know about their craft more than how they sleep and what they wear.

Do you think Mr Bachchan has got the recognition  he deserves?

You know , there’s one question about him that always plays on my mind. Why is Amitabh Bachchan such a big star in our country?  Why does he have  such a fan following? Why do people empathize with him? I feel social scientists  psychologists and monstrous   need to address themselves  to these  question. You know  we need to  take our cinema more seriously  rather than constantly treat it as  a source of  frivolous writing.  Serious analyses on cinema does entail the risk of criticism. But then  the risk is worth taking.

How do you  assess Amitabh Bachchan as an actor?

To begin with, he’s a  good and sensitive actor . Very observant also.  I think he has all the qualities necessary for a good actor . But   the sur of his performances   always depend on whom  he works with. You see his performances as being so different according to the directors . The Amitabh Bachchan in a Hrishikesh Mukherjee film was completely different from an Amitabh Bachchan in a Manmohan Desai film. There’s a perceptible tonal change in the films that he did with various directors. And then there  were those films where he just played according to his screen image instead of getting into character. I guess some directors wanted to capitalize on his larger-than-life image instead of tapping the actor. There was a period in his career when that was happening too often. That period saddened me. I always thought  he could do much more.

What  was that ‘more’ which you wanted in his career?

Better stories,   more layered characters,  and a   completely different style of acting. But I don’t know if audiences in this country would accept him  in roles that went against his image. In Hollywood all the major stars can experiment with their talent far more  than in this country. Here even if an actor changes his voice people jump and say , “It flopped because you changed your voice.”

You mean Agneepath, don’t you?

Yes. What kind of logic is that? What’s an actor supposed to do? On one  end you accuse him of doing the same thing over and over again. And when he tries to bring in different shades you accuse him of  failing because he was being different.  That isn’t  a problem with Amitabh  Bachchan alone. It’s a problem that all actors  face in our country. Audiences  and critics say they want an actor to be different. But when he does  it, they’ll turn around to say it isn’t working. It’s very strange. But if you do parallel cinema you’re called fantastic even if you give a bad performance. Even the parallel cinema has its own biased logistics. Pankaj Kapoor hasn’t been  given his dues although he’s a fantastic actor. Om Puri is such a good actor. And yet he hardly  gets the recognition he deserves. He’s  played all kinds of roles, and so well. But no one talks about him.

That’s because he doesn’t have a heroic personality.

Do  all our stars have to be heroic in stature?   You know  when you acquire a name in the offbeat cinema you can get away with mediocre performances. But a star like  Amitabh Bachchan who gives good performances even in  bad films is torn into shreds  because he’s a star .

Which are your favourite AB  performances?

I liked   him in Parwana. I loved  him in Saudagar because he was normal and so real, full of human frailties. I loved him in Agneepath, that’s one of  my favourites. I liked him in Aks.  And of course all those Hrishikesh Mukherjee films like Jurmana and Bemisal. By the way one of Amitji’s own favourites is Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s Alaap. I don’t like that  film  at all.  The story and   moral values were right. But I think Hrishikaku was going through a very idealistic  phase when he made it.

Do you think any other actor would take over from where  Mr Bachchan would one day leave off?

Hard to say. Times have changed. The  concepts of heroism have changed. Today the computer is the hero. Human heroes have become extinct. Where are the heroes in  politics? There was a time when we had Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, Jawaharlal Nehru…. Our country is in need of heroes in every walk of life

Do you feel Mr Bachchan has achieved  his optimum level as an actor?

You mean like  Paul  Muni? No, not really.  I  think he can do a lot more and a lot better. And he isn’t to blame for that.  It isn’t he who has set limits to his talent. It’s the people creating characters and moulding his performance whose vision  is  limited.

Where do you see his career going?

 The senior actors are no longer going to be ignored. I think  right from the start  Amitabh Bachchan  brought a  lot of dignity to the Hindi  film hero.

But Mr Bachchan thinks there are no roles for actors his age?

That’s true.  Look at Sean Connery or Harrison Ford in Hollywood. Roles are tailor made  for him. Amitji does get important roles but none specially written for him. Then again there’re  young directors lwho do write roles for him.  That’s because they’re young  and they have the vision. They’re making films not just for a local audience but to compete with international cinema. Like Aditya Chopra and Karan Johar,  Rakesh and  Karan will make a difference to Hindi cinema.   Even in  Vipul Shah ‘s   Aankhen the main dramatic focus was on Amitji, Paresh Rawail and Sushmita Sen.   And yet the film wouldn’t have worked without  Akshay Kumar and Arjun Rampal. So even  the younger actors today  realize the importance of  a character beyond the footage. If  Vipul Shah could convince so many big names to play the main roles then  I think we can safely say a time has come when we’re staring at a change in the way actors  and directors   look at commercial cinema.

It has taken a long time, hasn’t it?

It has. I remember I did Sholay although I had no footage because I felt it would turn out to be a  landmark film . My role was small and yet so significant. Without A. K. Hangal Saab, Sachin  and me   there  would have  been no emotions in Sholay.  Today’s actors have begun to recognize the significance of character over footage. It’s time   to stop  making immature assessments  about X actor making  chutti of Y actor.  Small or big, an actor must have the confidence to carry off any role which Amitji has. He’s like an obedient    schoolboy on the sets. He does his work as dilgently as any  sincere officegoer doing his 10-5  job. He’ll go on time , do what he’s asked to and then come back home having earned his living with utmost honesty.  He doesn’t let the outside world affect his performances.

What’s the one  thing that future actors generations should learn from Mr Bachchan?

How to be diligent, conscientious, honest and dignified towards one’s work.  He has never been apologetic about  being an actor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button